USEFUL CONTENT ABOUT IAS EXAM FOR STUDY

Where might one get the finest inspiration for their artistic endeavors? It is said that we must “stand on the shoulders of giants” in order to see farther than other people. The wisdom of proverbs tells us to follow this piece of advice. Because there is no need to “reinvent the wheel” when it comes to finding solutions to issues, this indicates that we need to make use of the existing information that has been supplied by our predecessors. A separate proverb, on the other hand, cautions us against being “stuck in a rut,” which means that utilizing our previous knowledge of ias. to solve issues might lead us to the same old worn-out ideas and blocked thinking that has hindered progress on such problems in the past. How are we supposed to pick amongst these supposedly different sources of wisdom? Empirical research on creative thinking and problem solving, which is referred to as the creative cognition approach in this chapter, is one approach to answering this question; in this section, I review a number of such empirical studies that investigate the potentially limiting effects of prior knowledge and were motivated by the creative cognition approach. One of the numerous categories that may be used to classify creative thinking is the comparison of paradigmatic thinking to revolutionary thought. The generation of new ideas occurs in gradual, incremental increments in the paradigmatic mode of creative thinking, but the revolutionary mode of creative thinking opens doors to daringly new vistas and viewpoints. While the vast majority of creative thought is of a paradigmatic kind, revolutionary leaps forward in creative thinking may sometimes be attributed to sudden epiphanies or flashes of insight. While this chapter does not discount the significance of creativity that occurs as a result of gradual paradigmatic shifts, its primary emphasis is placed on the less common kind of creative cognition that results in revolutionary ideas. It is argued, along with supporting empirical evidence, that previous experience can sometimes block or impede cognitive operations in memory, problem about ias exam solving, and creative thinking, and that similar cognitive processes are involved in all three spheres of activity. This claim is supported by empirical evidence. These kinds of limitations may have a significant impact not only on the creative ideas developed by individuals, but also by groups of people working together. in the current context, refers to anything that prevents or hinders the effective completion of many sorts of cognitive functions, such as those involved in retaining information, finding solutions to problems, and coming up with innovative ideas. Fixation, for instance, might make it difficult to retrieve information from long-term memory, such as the names of well-known celebrities or politicians, as well as information on the ias test. These same fixating pressures may also prevent solutions to puzzles or mathematical problems, like the well-known water jar issue or popular anagrams, from being found. Fixation, which may induce such obstacles in creative flow, can also restrict the routes taken while creative idea production is taking place in activities such as divergent thinking and brainstorming. Although fixation may take many different forms, there are a few broad patterns in which it might occur. These patterns include recent experience, normal thinking, and implicit assumptions. The act of approaching an issue in the same manner that is usually done for problems of that category is referred to as typical thinking. Typical thinking is basically the same as paradigmatic thinking. While conventional ways of thinking are typically helpful for a certain category of issues, there are other issues for which conventional techniques are not applicable, and these conventional approaches might cause the problem-solving process to go in circles. During the process of problem-solving, an individual may unconsciously engage in the act of making implicit assumptions. These are assumptions that the individual is unaware they have made. Implicit assumptions may impair cognitive functions when they are wrong or unjustified, but what makes them even more poisonous is that they do so discreetly, making it harder to discover them and then reject them. Recent experience frequently helps us get ready for upcoming events by instructing us to adopt mental sets, which are distinct procedures that are carried out in a repetitive manner in order to handle each issue in a sequence of problems with comparable characteristics.