It was not a simple case of wanderlust that pushed me to travel throughout the country during my years of curiosity; rather, it was the desire to study and observe exactly what the nation was all about that drove me to travel. After reaching this age, I have come to the realization that our country has lost its sense of purpose. While I was driving through Illinois on a scorching summer day, a suffocating odor made its way into my vehicle, despite the fact that the windows were closed as firmly as possible. It smelled like a dairy farm, although I didn’t see any dairy farms in the area. During the process of gassing up, I spoke with someone about the nature of the odor. My understanding was that it was the Chicago Stock Yards, which have been closed since 1971. I stated that I was relieved that I made the decision to leave it behind, and I couldn’t wait for the smell to go away. When someone asked me which way I was going, they laughed out loud and said, “You haven’t left it behind, the yards are still about twenty miles ahead of you.” This was the most surprising thing that happened to me. To this day, there has never been anything that can be compared to the smell of bull dung. The only exception to this is the recent social engineering changes that have been made to the nation by individuals who believe that all that is required to change laws, mores, folkways, traditions, protocols, nature, scientific evidence, the constitution, the Bible, and any semblance of common sense is to subjectively declare something to be true. As of recently, the discrimination laws of New York have been modified to include the imposition of a hefty punishment of $125,000 for the use of the incorrect pronoun when referring to a transgender individual. In the metropolis that has long ago gone to slumber, defiantly referring to a previous guy as “he” might result in a hefty punishment of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars. The New York City Commission on Human Rights and Mayor Bill de Blasio will, without a doubt, find this social engineering nightmare come under examination when and if the country pulls back toward conservatism after the elections which took place in 2016. It is a legislation that begs to be tested. Over the course of this time period, we have seen that the psychiatric specialists who had previously categorized homosexuality as a mental condition have entirely rethought their position. The LGBT community, along with its wide range of extended acronyms, has been effective in reducing the number of therapy sessions that are conducted on a state-by-state basis to address homosexual inclinations. Regarding the right to free expression with regard to homosexuals and transgendered individuals, the Constitution has been criticized, not because of what it says, but rather, in a peculiar way, because of what it does not say. In the event that the framers omitted to mention anything, then it must be absolutely OK. Despite the fact that liberal innovations have been successful in defeating intentions, the truth has been beaten to death and left for dead in tandem with this fictitious triumph. Assuming that the founders’ silence meant that men are allowed to marry other men is the same as believing in ghosts; we are unable to provide evidence that ghosts do not exist; yet, we do not make laws that are directed by the word of spirits that have passed away, do we? With the help our self-appointed exegete and theologian in chief Barack Obama, we have decided that the moral laws of the Bible, specifically those dealing with what the scripture calls the “abomination” of homosexuality, are all now relegated to the realm of meaningless, powerless, anachronistic and obscure passages that no one should take seriously. We believe that we have progressed from the old myths and meanderings of the devout and pious to the more enlightened findings of the empiricists, despite the fact that the Bible cautions us that neglecting these “obscure” passages might cost us our eternal destiny. In order to complete the last tango into full-blown hypocrisy, it is necessary to disregard what modernity has declared to be the new replacement for the Bible and the Constitution, which is science. When your DNA is checked, it will not lie to you, regardless of the pronouns you use, the amount of hormones you take, or even the mindset you adopt. This is a scientific fact that has been established. The results of DNA testing cannot be altered by factors such as a person’s clothing, cosmetics, hairstyle, hormones, or mental frames of mind. The DNA in your body will not lie for you if you were born a male; it just cannot. In light of the fact that science has successfully debunked the myth of religion, the question that begs to be posed is why we do not accept it when it comes to the issue of transgenderism. The accusation of hypocrisy cannot be leveled against genuine empiricism; nevertheless, we are able to do so, and the indictment against us is impending. The three chapters of scripture that are ageless, incomprehensible, and capable of speaking to both ancient and contemporary man are all attributed to King Solomon, who is considered to be the most wise of all time. Take, for example, the proverb that states, “There is a road that seems straight unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.” (Proverbs 14:12): The stupid guy is the one who believes every speech, but the sensible one is the one who looks well to his departure. 14:15 of the Bible A sensible man is one who is afraid of evil and stays away from it, while a fool is one who is angry and self-assured. (Proverbs 14:16) There is a possibility that those who advocate for the new morality are not incapable of recognizing moral truth; nonetheless, they are completely “assured” in their mistake. Instead of using Solomon, it could be more helpful to cite Josh McDowell, a Christian apologeticist, when speaking to those who are struggling with their moral conscience. Josh is said to have been the first person to remark, “I’d rather know a few things for certain than to be certain about a whole lot of things that simply aren’t so.” This statement is said to have been made by Josh. When we force the social engineering of liberal-minded hyper subjectivism on our populace in spite of the undeniable facts of science, we are not only making a mistake; rather, we are engaging in widespread hypocrisy. It is not only rude, but also ridiculous. Is it possible that we will alter the definition of pronouns in the future? Would it be accurate to claim that a pronoun is now used in lieu of a brain rather than a noun? Is this a possible interpretation of the current situation? In the event that science is the new god for the modern day, then not only have we abandoned the God of the Bible, but we are also not faithful to the most recent deity that we have adopted. As far as this writer is concerned, these so-called human rights regulations are akin to entering the stockyards for the second time. Since the year 2005, Michael Bresciani has been serving as the publisher of American Prophet.org. It is because of the articles and reports written by Reverend Bresciani, as well as the contributions of some of the most talented writers and journalists in the United States, as well as the news and reviews that the website has acquired the moniker of “The Website for Insight.” His timely reports and writings have been published in print and online journals and magazines and have been read by millions of people all over the world and nationwide. Please follow us on both Facebook and Twitter.
Author
jackemails@gmail.com