Since the Scopes trial took place in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925, the Darwinists are not the only ones who have investigated the evidence, or the lack of proof, but thousands of scientists from all over the globe have taken a second look at the evidence. Despite the growing body of evidence, the hypothesis of evolution continues to be rejected. Only the words that evolutionists employ to support what is fast becoming propaganda rather than cold, hard facts are more numerous than the missing connections between species. This is the only thing that outnumbers the missing links. This evidence is supported by a fundamental flaw in the definition of science that is considered to be the most accurate. The collecting of facts via visible occurrences that can be repeated is almost nonexistent in the questionable Darwinian assertions, which are now on the verge of becoming prophetic statements. In most cases, prophecy is concerned with the future; but, when evolutionists make big assertions about events that occurred billions of years ago, they are essentially claiming to be “prophets of the past.” It is neither science, nor is it prophesy, according to any definition. Don’t look at it since it is not science. In contrast to the evolutionary paradigm, the following is a brief summary of some of the most remarkable and recent discoveries that have been made. The remaining items on the list would be the length of a book; in fact, it would be enough to fill multiple volumes. Do you want to play a game of tag? The idea that mutation and special selection are the only ways to explain changes in plants is refuted by new evidence that demonstrates that plants have a layer of epigenetic information that demonstrates that they interact with their environment through the use of methyl tags. This eliminates the possibility that these two processes are the only means by which plants undergo changes. The response of evolutionists to this most recent revelation is that it is a lie! Before they express their disapproval, they need to have a look at the other parts of the narrative. It is not necessary to use an asteroid in order to support the Hydroplate Theory. As a result of the fact that every Darwinist explains the geologic ages without any possibility of eyewitness corroboration and disregards the obviously missing millions of links that should exist to prove inter species evolution, it follows that, when it comes to the realm of conjecture, any theory is just as good as another. The flood described in Genesis may have been responsible for the extinction of a great number of species and the topographical changes that occurred on the earth, such as the formation of the Grand Canyon and the oceanic trenches, which are visible today. This hypothesis has been put forward by a number of different people over the course of time. Within the pages of his eighth edition book, which is titled “In the Beginning – Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood,” Dr. Walt Brown advocates for a hypothesis that is often referred to as the “hydroplate theory.” In terms of the causes of dinosaur extinction, Darwinists are unable to provide a definitive answer; all they can do is speculate that the dinosaurs were killed off in a single event by an asteroid or another catastrophic catastrophe. The hypothesis put out by Dr. Brown is not only plausible, but it is also supported by every single piece of physical evidence that can be found in the geography of the planet. There is no need to hypothesize about asteroids. Lucy is no longer floating in the clouds with diamonds; she is now a chimp that is firmly rooted on the ground. “Lucy,” which was discovered in 1974, is one example of how far a theory can be pushed to resemble reality. Lucy was one of the few “missing links” that Darwinists put out in order to give credibility to their meticulously crafted tale. Lucy had a makeover in order to increase sales. This makeover was not performed by a presenter of a television talk show; rather, it was carried out by the paleoanthropologist Yohannes Haile-Selassie and the artist John Gurche, who are both affiliated with the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Not only are these modifications incapable of flying, but they are also unable to walk like a man. Furthermore, the bones of the feet disclose the conclusive evidence that Lucy is nothing more than a typical monkey. There is a possibility that those who think she is their long-lost mother are also coming dangerously near to fitting that description. At 1983, Lucy’s sister, Ida, was found, but she was not disclosed as the eighth wonder of the world until a bargain was reached over a few swigs of vodka in a pub in Hamburg, Germany. This is the next big thing that is generating a lot of excitement. The monkey genus and species Darwinius masillae was instantly referred to as Ida because of its popularity. The rush to confirm that Ida is the final proof of Darwin’s delusion has been met with real scientific analysis, which places Ida in the category of wishful thinking and further exemplifies the desperation of evolutionists to find support for their theory, which is untenable and becoming increasingly intolerable. There is one thing that all of the transitional linkages have in common, and that is that they are still absent. The only place where they can be found is in the imaginations of evolutionists, and it is disgraceful that, in the absence of all of them, we continue to impose this foolishness on every student in today’s educational system, from kindergarten all the way up to graduate school. Check it out for yourself instead of waiting for the book to arrive. The most recent discoveries in the field of creation science are published on a number of websites, one of which is: Creation Science Today. It is a list that is not only helping me to keep my promise not to turn this article into a book-length feature article, but it is also helping me to keep a short list of eye openers that can be found on the landing page of this website. These eye openers not only have the ability to stimulate a brain that has been numbed down by the Darwin dope, but they can also help me to keep my promise. Today is not the day of the Scopes Trial; rather, there are resources accessible in libraries, references, bibliographies, CDs, and visual tools that provide a comprehensive response to the fallacy of Darwin via the application of sound scientific study and scientific inquiry. • There is no exception to the rule that evolution is in direct opposition to natural laws, but creation is in accordance with natural laws. For instance, creation is in accordance with the rules of thermodynamics and the law of biogenesis. • There are no known biological mechanisms that may lead to greater degrees of organization and complexity in evolution. Mutations are almost always detrimental, and none of them are “uphill” (that is, unquestionably advantageous) in the sense that they contribute additional genetic material to the gene pool. A global flood, as portrayed in the Book of Genesis, is perfectly compatible with the geologic landforms and sedimentary characteristics that have been seen. Indicators of a global flood include enormous limestone formations, enormous coal and oil formations, and enormous subsurface salt layers. These types of formations are not the result of slow and gradual processes that have occurred over billions of years. A global flood, together with well-established geophysical and geochemical processes, provides a satisfactory explanation for such characteristics. • See the phase diagram in chapter 4 and the Pangaea Flood Video on CreationScienceToday.com for more information. A global flood, as described in Genesis 6–8, is capable of occurring within the limitations of known geophysics. In the process of determining the age of sedimentary rock, there is no method that can be considered reliable. The fossil dating method, which is used to determine the age of sedimentary rock, is plagued by circular reasoning and guesswork, all of which are based on the assumption that evolution occurred. • The traditional geologic column, which depicts transitional organisms progressing toward more sophisticated forms, is completely artificial and deceptive, and it does not reflect the actual world. This column is portrayed in the majority of scientific textbooks. Indeed, it is an accurate representation of the aftermath of a deluge that occurred all over the planet. • There is not a single example of evolution; there are no fossils that represent transitions or living creatures. The quest for “the” missing link is something that evolutionists are doing, but ironically, they are really simply looking for one. Instead, if evolution were genuine, there should be billions of instances of transitional forms with transitional features; however, there are none of these examples. The fact of the matter is that evolution has never been detected in fossils or in populations that are still alive. In contrast to the widespread notion, there is evidence that suggests that early man had a high level of intelligence and expertise, as well as a sophisticated social organization. There is also evidence that suggests they believe in the existence of an afterlife because of their beliefs. The bones of dinosaurs that are believed to be between 70 and 250 million years old have been discovered to include soft tissues as well as signs of blood cells. (The lifespans of soft tissues and red blood cells are comparable to those of younger cells.) • Carbon-14 has been discovered in what are believed to be diamonds and coal that are hundreds of millions of years old. (The lifespan of C-14 is not even close to being long.) • Radioisotope dating is plagued by a number of assumptions that cannot be shown; the method is considered “fatally defective.” Despite this, scientists continue to assert as fact what they are unable to demonstrate. The presence of abundant daughter isotopes is indicative of accelerated nuclear decay associated with creation (expansion, stretching out, or acceleration of the universe from an extremely hot, dense phase when matter and energy were concentrated) and a worldwide flood with massive restructuring of the earth’s lithosphere, rather than slow and gradual processes that take place over billions of years. • Helium in zircon crystals, radiohalos and fission tracks, as well as fast magnetic field reversals and decay, are all examples of evidence that show accelerated nuclear decay in igneous rocks that have been discovered all over the globe. More than one hundred geochronometers point to the planet and the cosmos being relatively young. There are a few more websites that are both intriguing and helpful, like CreationResearch.org, AnswersinGenesis.org, and ICR.org. In the realm of evolution and prophecy, there exists a connection that is not absent. Just in time to fit the very last generation’s dive into a worldview that entirely eliminates responsibility to a Creator/Redeemer God, Darwin’s fantastic explanation for all living things has arrived just in time. According to Paul, one of the most important ways in which God is revealed is via the act of creation. If, as the evolutionary model asserts, everything came about by its own free will (did it think), then we do not have to account to God. The arrival of this suitable notion has come at an opportune time, just in the nick of time to support the consequence of evolutionary promotion. I’m sorry to say that it is functioning well. Paul begins by stating, “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are plainly seen, being understood by the things that are created, even his everlasting power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.” This is the first and most important statement that Paul makes. Ro 1:20 (Ro 1) The rejection of the indications and proof provided by the Creator has a fatal consequence. When Paul comes to the end of his discussion on creation, he provides a synopsis of what occurs when a group of people come to the conclusion that the creation does not demonstrate the craftsmanship of God. The fact that this is the first step of the ultimate judgment is a source of considerable sadness. The phenomena is known as reprobation, and it is taking place all across the globe today. “And even though they did not desire to keep God in their knowledge, God handed them up to a reprobate mentality, so that they would do those things that are not convenient.” (Romans 1:28)] The final judgment is not Jurassic Park; rather, it is the real thing, and Charles Darwin will not be there to search for our names in the book of life. We will stand alone and without any kind of supporting theory. Science is good, and science fiction is fun, but the final judgment is not Jurassic Park. The essays and reports written by Reverend Michael Bresciani, a journalist, have been posted on American Prophet.org since 2005. In addition, this website also features news and reviews, which has earned it the moniker of “The Website for Insight.” His timely reports and writings have been published in print and online journals and magazines and have been read by millions of people all over the world and nationwide. Please follow us on both Facebook and Twitter. This article is related to the following: the props of Darwinism, methyl tags, hydroplate theory, scopes trial, missing links, prophetic link, geochronometers, evolution and prophecy, and some related articles. Revelation 1:20 This article should be sent to a friend! Subscribe to have articles like as this one sent directly to your inbox! Get a free subscription right now!
Author
jackemails@gmail.com