There are enemies, fun, forensics, and Fitbit. You have walked 10,000 steps today; have you logged them? Has anybody else been able to locate them? It is a lucrative business to sell fitness trackers since they assist individuals in becoming and being active, as well as in sharing their progress with their friends and, in some cases, with complete strangers. It is likely that the Fitbit and the applications that are coupled with the Apple Watch are the most well-known of these devices (and apps). However, the Moov Now, Samsung Gear Fit, Huawei Band, Tom Tom Spark, and over 350 additional gadgets are also included in this category. The capability of these gadgets to trace your travels is one of the additional aspects that makes them more enjoyable and appealing. Utilizing data from a Fitbit, a prospective killer may be apprehended. In situations that are not all that humorous, fitness trackers have the potential to give proof in the most serious of situations. Richard Dabate related to police enforcement in Connecticut a story of a break-in in which the thief murdered his wife as he was attempting to prevent the invader from entering his home. The story was presented near the end of 2015. The difficulty was that data of her Fitbit that were subpoenaed indicated that she was active an hour after the murder was supposed to have taken place, and that she traveled 10 times farther than what would have brought her within the view of the now-fictional perpetrator. Along with additional pieces of evidence, including those from computers, Facebook, and cellphones, as well as the fact that Dabate had a girlfriend who was pregnant, he was taken into custody for the crime. As at the time this article was written, Mr. Dabate is still free on bail of one million dollars. Data from a Fitbit helps an innocent man escape justice. As of the month of May in the year 2016, Nicole Vander Heyder went out on the town in Green Bay, Wisconsin, but she never returned home. Her corpse, which was located in a neighboring agricultural field, was found nude and covered with blood. Doug Detrie, her boyfriend, was detained, but he seemed stunned by the news and maintained his innocence. At first, the indicators pointed to him as the one responsible for the incident. Due to the fact that the apparent evidence (blood in the car, blood in the garage, and a suspicious spot on the sole of his shoe) did not hold up (the blood in the car was not the victim’s blood, the blood in the garage was not a human’s blood, and the suspicious spot was not blood), Detrie was released from custody. He was held on a bond of one million dollars. The information obtained from Doug’s Fitbit revealed that he had only taken around a dozen steps throughout the period of time in which Nicole passed away. There was DNA evidence from Nicole’s clothing that went to a different guy entirely, and that man was George Burch. It was discovered that Burch’s Android phone included Google Dashboard data that was linked to his Gmail account. This data displayed GPS position data that led directly to Nicole’s residence. In the end, he was charged with first-degree murder, subsequently found guilty of the crime, and sentenced to life in prison, despite the fact that he continues to maintain his innocence. Mollie Tibbett, a student at the University of Iowa, went for a jog in July of 2018, and she has not been seen since. The data from her Fitbit was utilized to attempt to locate the missing person. In an effort to identify her, the police have obtained her Fitbit data; however, they have not disclosed the information that they discovered in that data to the general public. Unfortunately, it seems that the geolocation information included inside it was not sufficient to locate her. Additionally, additional data from her mobile phone and social media accounts has been combed through in search of clues; but, as of August 6, 2018, there have been no reports of her being located, despite the fact that there seem to be individuals of interest. With any luck, the GPS data from her Fitbit will ultimately assist in directing detectives to the place where she is now located. data from Fitbit to be prohibited by the military Recent news reports may have informed you that the United States Army has voiced its worry over the potential for data from fitness trackers and other gadgets, such as the Apple Watch, to jeopardize the security of military operations and movements. a military officer was cited as stating, “the minute a soldier puts on a gadget that can capture high-definition audio and video, take images, and process and send data, it’s highly conceivable for him or her to be monitored or to divulge military secrets … When military personnel use wearables that have the ability to access the internet, provide location information, and make phone calls, this should be deemed a breach of the rules that govern national security. However, were you aware that this news was published in May of 2015? Did you know that it was a Chinese military officer who was quoted in the publication of the Chinese army, which is called the Liberation Army Daily? This is correct; for a number of years now, governments in other countries have been prohibiting the use of such gadgets. The Department of Defense (DOD) distributed 2,500 Fitbits to military personnel in 2013. In 2015, the Navy planned to run a pilot program to help enlisted personnel and their superiors keep track of fitness goals, and to “allow army leaders to track their soldiers’ fitness in real time.” Fitbit geolocation data was banned by the United States military in 2013. The Fitbit has a user base that exceeds 10 million individuals, with the exception of members of the armed forces. There are three different ways to see the information: online, on a mobile device, or via the desktop program. Along with tracking activity, Fitbit also gives users the ability to record additional health-related data inside the app. This data is then used by Fitbit in order to illustrate progress over a period of time. The administrator of a companion app known as Strava assists in mapping and displaying maps of the movement of subscribers who are using fitness tracking gadgets such as Fitbit and other similar devices. Strava came out with its global heat map in November of 2017, which was comprised of three trillion unique global GPS data points that were submitted over the course of the preceding two years. Nathan Ruser, an Australian security student, zoomed in on the maps, which showed the preferred pathways that military fitness enthusiasts take in bases that had not been publicized before. As seen below, there are paths in and near Moghadishu that may have supplied prospective targets for Somali rebels. These trails are located in areas that are often visited by military personnel. As one might expect, the United States Army issued a directive on August 7, 2018, that prohibited the use of geolocation features in fitness trackers such as iPhones, Apple Watches, Fitbits, and other similar devices. The directive stated that “effectively immediately, defense department personnel are prohibited from using geolocation features and functionality on government and non-government-issued devices, applications, and services while in locations designated as operational areas.” The use of the gadgets, as well as their possession, has not been completely prohibited. It is the law of unintended consequences, according to Fitbit. Unintended outcomes may be broken down into three categories. (in accordance with Wikipedia) The unexplained advantages include: a beneficial and unexpected benefit, such as the release of a person who was suspected of murder and discovered to be clear of charges owing to the fact that he wore a fitbit. Instead of demonstrating the successful completion of an athletic activity, it demonstrated passivity in the face of a crime that would have needed a significant amount of movement, as was the case with Doug Detrie and Nicole Vander Heyder as examples. a disadvantage that was not anticipated: a disadvantage that occurred in addition to the effect that was intended to be produced by the policy. For example, a Fitbit could display a person who was supposed to be the victim of a crime as the person who committed the crime, as was the case with Richard Dabate and his wife. for example, when military troops who are using a Fitbit to keep track of their fitness progress disclose themselves as prospective targets to an opponent, this is an example of a perverse result: an impact that is contradictory to what was first intended. We can only hope that none of these events will ever occur in the lives of any of the people who read my work. Stay in shape and keep track of things, but be careful that you could be divulging more information than you mean to. steve burgess is a freelance technology writer, a professional computer forensics expert as the principal of burgess forensics, and a contributor to the book, scientific evidence in civil and criminal proceedings, 5th edition by moenssens, et al. The website https://www.burgessforensics.com or the email address steve@burgessforensics.com are both addresses that may be used to contact Mr. Burgess. Mr. Burgess is also the president of the Foresight Institute, which is a nonprofit organization that focuses on nanotechnology and transformational technology in Palo Alto.
Author
jackemails@gmail.com