GENERATE NEW IDEAS THROUGH THE ABOUT GROUP DISCUSSION

The majority of study and literature on creativity has concentrated on individual innovation, sometimes known as the “lone genius.” However, there has been little awareness of the social and group debate as aspects that impact the creative process. The goal of most of the study done on creativity is to better understand the characteristics that contribute to creative persons and activities. There are a number of aspects that seem to be the driving force behind creative activity, some of which include personality, developmental experiences, culture, motivation, and cognitive ability. A consideration of group processes is not included in the review that was written by Mumford and Gusted Son. Research conducted in the middle of the century uncovered very few, if any, citations of gd creativity. In addition, literature on creativity or genius almost seldom, if ever, addressed the topic, and when they did, they often portrayed gd elements in a bad light. Isolation and the need for one’s own internal reflection were often identified as essential components of successful creative endeavors. Some of the first research on gd creativity in educational settings was done by, who emphasized how important it was to have a diverse group of participants. encouraged the use of brainstorming as a productive method for fostering creative thinking. A contemporary creativity guidebook does discuss the concept of group brainstorming, but it does not contain the word “creativity” anywhere in the topic index. The only thing that stays the same is change in this world. Change is a constant in governmental systems, cultural practices, economic systems, technological advances, artistic practices, and academic disciplines. Where does this seemingly endless cycle of change come from? It is conceivable that the invigorating impacts of novel concepts are at the root of much of the change that occurs in the world. It’s possible that someone will come up with an innovative plan for how to govern a nation or a firm, that musicians will create new kinds of music, and that scientists may discover new methods or pieces of information that might have a significant effect on society. The term “huge c” has been used to refer to this style of creative thinking on occasion. creativity There is also a lot of creativity in day-to-day life since individuals are always trying to find solutions to issues, whether they are at work, at home, or when driving somewhere in between. Of course, many original ideas may not be effective or impactful. Because of this, creativity is frequently defined as the process of coming up with unique ideas that serve a purpose or have an impact. Due to the proliferation of information and the growing need for increasing specialization, the process of coming up with innovations will increasingly require the participation of groups at some point in the process. These days, the success of most businesses as well as a significant portion of the scientific method is dependent on the combined efforts of teams whose members bring a variety of experiences and expertise. In the context of businesses, the primary advocates of creative group discussions have been linked to new product development. originated in the promotion of brainstorming as a valuable method for the production of unique ideas via group debate. addressed group elements in the book he authored on the subject of fostering creativity, and processes were given a prominent position in the theory of organizational creativity by. People who advocate for collaboration, bennie, and collaborative learning have the most excitement for gd creativity. This is because these activities encourage collaborative learning. despite the fact that collaborative learning and work teams have become standard features in many organizations and educational institutions