Assigning characteristics is the next stage of information shaping, carrying over from part three of the realitysculp series. Currently, data that hasn’t been rejected will go through the color filters. These filters allocate characteristics that categorize how information fits into each person’s own worldview. Observe that we are returning to the subject of how an individual’s conception of reality affects their perception. It’s crucial to understand that selection plays a crucial role in how information is categorized. The veracity filter will be the first one we talk about. All data will be categorized by this filter into one of three groups: true, false, or unknown. Information that confirms or is in line with a person’s present worldview is often labelled as true without the need for further proof. Furthermore, material that directly challenges a person’s worldview is often dismissed as false, again without further investigation. Contradictory data is often ignored with little or no scrutiny, much to the great chagrin of many, who find that their data is rejected out of hand since they are seen as false. Put otherwise, when someone has a belief and is confronted with information contradicting it, they tend to ignore the data and continue with their belief system. This explains why truthers’ shockingly conflicting evidence against the controlled narrative is so readily disregarded. Only information that is difficult to categorize into the existing worldview will be considered unclear and may be given further consideration. The veracity filter process is a crucial idea to comprehend as how data is categorized can greatly influence the person’s behavior reaction, if any, to the information. The majority of facts won’t influence behavior to change since most info that is recognized as true or false has little effect on how a person perceives the world. The only data that may sabotage the selection-biased attribute assignment process is data that is both difficult to categorize and falls inside the individual’s reality. As we previously stated, the honesty filter works in concert with the prevailing worldview to score evidence in a feedback loop that is skewed toward supporting that viewpoint; only modifications to the worldview will be able to reverse this bias. This self-perpetuating bias makes it difficult or impossible to remove the veracity filter, and as we already said, worldviews are created throughout infancy. The group of people who are least likely to accept the validity of contradicting information is grownups. This is the reason why children’s worldviews from their early schooling and media exposure tend to be particularly resistant to changing throughout their lives. Combine this with reinforcement from specific, propagandized ideas and inaccurate or partial historical facts that students must learn in order to get a PhD. This essential and natural data filter will have been successfully taken over and is now acting as delusion protection by the time they cross the stage wearing that last mason mortar board on their head. As a consequence, the typical Westerner is now unable to distinguish between accurate and misleading information on their own and will go to someone in a position of authority to do it for them. Despite what may appear counterintuitive, a person’s average disability increases with their level of education or completion. Pondering is one of the essential activities of wild people that every would-be controller must eradicate (thinking critically about any particular issue). Interestingly, a technique for applying the veracity filter has been shown to significantly cut down on, and even completely remove, the act of thinking before it may cause erratic individual behavioral reactions. Keep in mind that any information marked as for consideration by the arc filter might prompt thought. The veracity filter, however, offers still another opportunity to stop this. Children are taught in the current educational system that all knowledge may be classified as either entirely true or entirely false, depending on how they interpret the world. Little ones are taught that every other possible condition for knowledge, such as partly true or unverified, is in the category of false. This is an intriguing method since people who operate under this worldview often consider any information that supports the preexisting worldview to be true and almost all other information to be false. This essentially removes the need for the person to examine the information. According to educators, it is one of the better ways to shape the public’s worldview and create people who can perceive accurately, think clearly, and act effectively. this is because contemplation is almost eliminated by the sheer essence of this worldview. Children have an innate tendency to accept information from reliable sources—like family—as true and don’t need more clarification or validation. Through a process known as rapid learning, kids may swiftly and securely acquire vital knowledge from the people who look after them. We need to go back to the idea that when information comes from a reliable source, children will accept it as true without question. This process that enables people to adopt the perspective of early caregivers gives them a significant survival advantage, but it also creates a major vulnerability that can be abused by those in positions of power. Through public education, the state may become a trustworthy source of knowledge and a caregiver for the young people in their care. Without needing any justification or confirmation, kids take the teacher’s information about the context and substance of the lesson as true on an instinctual level. It is almost hard for a kid to shake the conviction that an idea is real for the duration of their life once it is instilled in them. This is because there is such a profound and comprehensive acceptance of facts and conceptions as true. Humans possess an innate method for confirming the veracity of facts, which is based on their five senses. The very young will directly check every part of our world, testing it everything. Children are steered away from one kind of personal verification throughout the educational process and toward another where data is verified by an outside authority (experts). With this approach, every data that an individual is allowed to access is labeled or rated according to the truthfulness by an outside authority (the state). Children learn to believe the opinions of experts more than their own experiences because they are told by their teachers and other trusted caretakers that these ill-defined experts are both kind and much more capable of deciding the truth than the individual. The person is trained to verify with the official source and not to question or look into the veracity of anything. When one examines this idea with an open mind, it becomes evident how illogical it is. A normal person interacts with persons they know have lied or are lying for self-serving purposes on a daily basis. However, one would be called a conspiracy theorist if they claimed that the governments or the richest individuals in the world may be lying for their own benefit. This is the way that society has been conditioned to think that characteristics shared by the majority of people do not apply to the group that is wealthy and powerful. However, when pushed, the majority of people are aware of the conflicting history that shows that some of the worst crimes in recorded history were brutally committed in order to get this riches and power. The idea that data genuinely has three classifications—true, false, and unknown—must be understood and accepted by individuals on the road of mindfreedom. It is crucial that the independent thinker understand that, most of the time, they do not have to categorize information as true or false right away. Above all, they must revisit the verification procedure they were instructed in. Never forget that approved or authorized equates to spin. Bob Jones writes on topics that are at the heart of our existence and is committed to raising awareness of the significance of events that have a significant impact on the security and quality of life of the average person. Rather than presenting a list of titles or literary honors, Jones applies common sense and reasoning to concepts and events that the general public is being kept ignorant of through education and the media. In addition, he publishes a website devoted to ending human suffering. Click the link to read more stories, or go to our website at http://www.dragontamers.com. linked articles: self-awareness, media control, and free thinking.
Author
jackemails@gmail.com