That someone like Hillary Clinton has actually made an acceptance speech for the Democratic National Committee’s nomination for President of the United States is such a shocking revelation that anyone who can still remember the Reagan years in the United States or even before that is reeling in stark incredulity. Over the course of many years, the Democratic Party has evolved into a staunchly liberal party, and some people are claiming that it has become the party of pure evil. In the event that you are uncertain about the identity of Hillary Clinton, it would be beneficial for you to make a hasty trip to the nearest theater that is now screening Dinesh D’Souza’s film “Hillary’s America.” At this moment, it is the documentary that has earned the most money in 2016. There are not many positive things that Mr. Jim Kouri has to say about Hillary Clinton. He is a prominent online writer, a former vice president, and a board member of the National Association of Chiefs of Police. Kouri cautions that Hillary is the most anti-Christian liberty bigot in the country, with the exception of Barack Obama. This is the most crucial warning that Kouri makes. “When reports of Islamic terrorists knifing an 86-year-old Catholic priest to death in a French church, the Democratic Party’s elite — President Barack Obama, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, and others — failed to show anything that even approached the anger they display when they hear of a Muslim being “profiled” by law enforcement,” Kouri writes in an article titled “Clinton’s anti-Christianity: U.S. Catholic leaders ignore election moral responsibility.” Kouri’s essay is titled “Clinton’s anti-Christianity: U.S. Catholic leaders ignore election moral responsibility.” Despite this, a significant number of the most devoted Christians in the United States, including Catholics, are prepared to cast their ballots for a woman whose hands are often bathed in human blood to become the 45th President of the United States. Are there, in fact, “moral duties” that should be taken into consideration during an election? As a matter of fact, there are, and among all of them, the most fundamental of them all is the need to elect individuals who are, for the most part, honest. Within a short period of time after the murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi, Hillary Clinton’s dishonesty in the management of her emails and her participation in the falsehoods that were nurtured followed closely after. The country ought to be able to suspect Clinton based on these signs, but the true clincher concerning Hillary’s dishonesty is that it simply takes a regular calculator and not any confidential information from the State Department. We will go into more detail about it later, but before we do that, let’s take a look at what Mrs. Clinton said in her most recent acceptance speech. When it comes to the topic of employment and the economy, Hillary began by asserting that President Obama’s economic policies have been a complete and utter success in comparison to those of the administrations that came before him. In light of the fact that the country is now facing a debt of 19 trillion dollars, it is difficult to comprehend that she even bothered to speak up on the matter. Mrs. Clinton issued the following statement about employment: “My major aim as President will be to generate more opportunities and more excellent jobs with greater salaries right here in the United States… From the first day I take office until the day I leave office!” Particularly in locations that have been neglected and neglected for an excessively lengthy period of time. Our inner cities, our little towns, our Indian Country, and our coal country are all included in this category. ranging from districts that have been emptied away by factory closures to villages that have been destroyed by addiction. The prospective workers who are found in the wombs of pregnant women in the United States were curiously absent from Mrs. Clinton’s list of beneficiaries. However, this is a lady who looks up to Saul Alinsky, Margaret Sanger, and Barack Obama as her role models, mentors, and idols. Her conclusion on employment was yet another example of her incongruity, as she asked, “What are we offering? A courageous plan to enhance the lives of people all around our nation, with the goals of ensuring your safety, assisting you in obtaining better employment, and providing your children with the opportunity they are entitled to. The decision is clear.” If “kids” are permitted to forego being the sacrifices for what Hillary refers to as “women’s rights,” then the options that Hillary is presenting are better life, safety, excellent employment, and opportunities for them. However, this is an assumption that Hillary is making. With Hillary safeguarding Roe v. Wade for the next four years, the number of potential workers in the United States that are killed is between four and six million. This is the current rate of abortion in the United States, which ranges from three thousand to three thousand nine hundred per day. Given a reliable calculator, it takes just ten seconds to determine which of Hillary’s lies is the most significant. Could someone in the Democratic National Committee kindly let Mrs. Clinton know that there are no jobs available for the deceased? “Therefore, when you do that which is right in the eyes of the LORD, you will eradicate the sin of innocent blood from among you,” the Bible says. (Deuteronomy 21:9) Since 2005, Michael Bresciani has served as the editor of the website American Prophet.org. It is because of the articles and reports written by Reverend Bresciani, as well as the contributions of some of the most talented writers and journalists in the United States, as well as the news and reviews that the website has acquired the moniker of “The Website for Insight.” His timely reports and writings have been published in print and online journals and magazines and have been read by millions of people all over the world and nationwide. Please follow us on both Facebook and Twitter.
Author
jackemails@gmail.com