FACT One: Information Regarding Nuclear Weapons 1. The Pakistani nuclear program was first begun by the late Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in the year 1972. During the latter half of the 1970s, Pakistan’s program was able to obtain sensitive uranium enrichment technology and knowledgeable personnel. The presence of Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan in 1975 brought about a significant further advancement of these initiatives. Dr. Khan is a metallurgist who was educated in Germany. He carried with him expertise of gas centrifuge technologies that he had learned during the course of his employment at the secret URENCO uranium enrichment facility in the Netherlands. 3. Dr. A.Q. Khan introduced the technique to the world by bringing a duplicate from the Netherlands. 4. The first funding for Bhutto came from Libya, which lost some of its funds due to embezzlement. 5. General Zia, who had previously obtained entire financial support from Saudi Arabia, once again took control of the situation. 6. Pakistan has been accused of transferring nuclear technology to Iran, which is the financier’s most bitter adversary. In order to indirectly assist Pakistan’s balance of power with India, the United States has turned a blind eye to the progress in Pakistan’s nuclear research and development. 8. The actions of the United States have always been skewed in favor of Pakistan, including the war that took place in 1971 and the provision of financial assistance to Pakistan totaling 67 billion dollars over the course of the preceding 68 years. It is now the case that China and Russia are in favor of India having a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council; nevertheless, the United States continues to be a barrier to the realization of India’s goals. 10. The Army, which is now led by the General in charge, is in favor of measures that are favorable to Saudi Arabia. In 1999, a year after Pakistan conducted two nuclear weapons tests, the Saudi Defense Minister, Prince Sultan, paid a visit to the unguarded uranium enrichment facility at Kahuta, which is located outside of Islamabad. This visit prompted opposition from the diplomatic community. 11. In the previous year, Riyadh’s concern regarding the possibility of Iranian nuclear hegemony in the Gulf region increased. Pakistan’s Chief of Army Staff, General Raheel Sharif, was a guest of honor when Saudi Arabia publicly paraded its Chinese CSS-2 missiles for the first time since they were delivered in the 1980s. The CSS-2 missile was formerly the essential component of China’s nuclear arsenal, despite the fact that it is now almost completely outdated. Initial nuclear weapons developed by Pakistan were modeled after those developed by China. This unequivocally demonstrates the support that the Pakistan Army has for Saudi Arabia. 12. On the other hand, the civilian government of Pakistan has shown a change in its foreign policy via a resolution that was passed by the National Assembly of Pakistan. A pro-Syria-Iran remark made by the Pakistani Ambassador in Damascus has contributed to the uncertainty that has been caused as a result of this. 13. When faced with a scenario such as this one, the foreign policy is a two-tiered structure that is managed by two institutions that are in opposition to one another. It is possible that this may isolate the civilian leadership of Pakistan from the 22 members of the Arab League and the 57 members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation who have excluded Syria from their forums. FACT 2: The Contradictions Regarding the Presence of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan Regarding the knowledge of the Pakistani establishment of holding OBL at a safe house in Islamabad, the remark that was made by Mr. Ahmed Mukhtar, a former Pakistani Defense Minister, to CNN-IBN was refuted. It is possible that the majority of Pakistanis, Pakistani Americans, or Americans who are supportive of Pakistan, including myself, do not agree with the presence of OBL in Pakistan (to have been under the tacit approval of Pakistani establishment). However, taking into consideration the sensitive nature of the area surrounding the compound, it is not possible to rule out the possibility of such happening. FACT-3 The Saudis have provided Pakistan with enormous sums of money in order to develop its nuclear capabilities. One of the questions that has not been resolved at international forums is how to determine the reasons for the growing support from Iran and the decreasing support from Saudi Arabia. Iran has not been involved in any wars other than those involving Sunni states in recent times, and it has not aided Pakistan in a manner that is even more similar to what the Saudis have done. THAT IS, IS THERE A REASON FOR IT? QUESTION-2: Despite the fact that Pakistan has gotten unparalleled backing from the United States ever since her creation, someone has managed to deceive the United States by keeping OBL at a safe paradise. The majority of experts from the United States anticipate that Pakistan’s national security agency would have a two-tiered structure. In addition, the present administration gives Russia and China more weight than the interests of the United States of America in a variety of different situations. During my conversations with a retired general and a current brigadier, I had the impression that they were unaware of the United States’ involvement in the Indo-Pakistani conflict of 1971. Despite the fact that these facts are well documented under Nixon’s Tilt on the internet, which was retrieved through the freedom of privacy act and is known as the Anderson papers, such ignorance at the highest level demonstrates either a deliberate cover-up to established facts or incompetence on the part of Pakistan’s national security. In Pakistan, who is responsible for concealing certain realities from the general public’s perceptions? After considering both of the questions in fact-3, I have come to the conclusion that the identity is the same. To summarize, facts 1 and 2 indicate that it is a precursor to the conflict in Syria that was caused by supporters of Hezbollah in Pakistan.
Author
jackemails@gmail.com