At this point in time, the insults are coming in like a flood. First, the leftist publication GQ magazine, which has the same level of sophistication as a plane accident, has insulted Ben Carson for his statement that individuals should protect themselves against those who commit mass murder. One would be hard pressed to find anything to say about a publication that seems to have its headquarters in a distant place – the world? Then, out of nowhere, Geraldo appears on the Factor. Putting Carson’s belief in creationism in a negative light on Friday, October 9, 2015. As a result of the fact that I am supporting Ted Cruz, the man who Rush just referred to as the “most principled,” they cannot accuse me of being biased in my statements. I am speaking out of contempt at the arrogant and self-assured Rivera, who felt the need to insult millions of people in the United States. In the United States of America, not everyone has bought into the Darwinian theory; rather, there are those of us who have opted to think about it on our own. We have not all heeded the word of a college lecturer who threatened to fail us if we did not laugh along with him over the humorous and controversial statements that were made regarding the creation account during the Scopes monkey trial in 1925. When Darrow raised the famous question about the snake being cursed to slither on its belly, the court reportedly burst out laughing. This is according to the reports. In response to the question, Bryan, who had been brought to the stand, said with a straightforward yes, he did think that was what had occurred. The question was posed by Darrow, “Have you any notion how the snake did before that time?” If the question were asked about the common butterfly, and the answer was found in nature rather than in the scripture, we can only speculate about the amount of laughter that would be generated. Because it had to crawl about on a hundred legs at one time in its existence, is the winged bug considered to be cursed from that point on? In the event that nature is capable of undergoing such a transition, how simple would it be for the God of nature to alter any creature that he has created? In 1925, the reasoning that was being used was not logic at all; rather, it was plain old ridicule. The precise evidence that scientists rely on to construct the theory of evolution is the very evidence that creationists are using today to disprove the dream that Darwin had about evolution. There is no question that the thing that we refer to as empiricism, sometimes known as the scientific method, is the holy cow of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. There are some scientists who are neither atheists or Darwinists who have been examining and dealing with the evolutionary model right now for the last hundred years. A terrible disgrace has been brought upon the scientific community, and if there is one thing that it is still lacking, it is the missing connections. During the course of human growth, the phases that are transitional should be present everywhere. The generations that are believed to have occurred over the course of billions of years would yield evidence specimens that number in the millions instead. They are not real at all. The capacity to accept a conclusion that is not supported by the data is another characteristic of contemporary science that does not exist despite its potential existence. Although it has momentum, the evolutionary model does not have legitimacy. In the course of their investigation, thousands of experts, researchers, and organizations have examined Darwin’s doting and arrived to different results. All of these findings have been made without making any reference to the Bible. Creation.com and The Institute for Creation Research are two of my favorite websites that can be found on the internet. Insisting that there is no other explanation, but evolution is perfectly acceptable if the facts and the science were all entirely in agreement with each other, but this is not the case. This author was astounded to see that my essay titled “Darwinism’s Props and Propaganda Approaching the Pathetic” received more blog responses in 2013 than any other item that I had written during that same year. After going through the conventional arguments, I was most impressed by the lack of originality shown by individuals who responded to the questions. When I was younger, I was certain that it was a fundamental drive for political correctness of our time, seeded in our age by our most sworn adversary, whose primary mission is to eliminate responsibility to God. I am still certain of this now. I have published a great number of other pieces on the topic, and when I consider the fact that Ben Carson and I have the same point of view, I realize that I am in excellent company. I would wait until the editors of GQ and the pompous Geraldo learned how to separate conjoined twins before I gave any credit to their thoughts about Dr. Ben Carson. In the meanwhile, I would wait until they learned how to separate siblings. In spite of the fact that Geraldo made condescending remarks about Carson, stating things like “I truly like the guy,” the damage had already been done before. It is possible that Geraldo has to mature and take this into consideration before he makes fun of a man’s religion on national television by comparing it to a fairy tale. For example, the Bible says, “He who has knowledge spares his words, and a man of wisdom is of a good spirit.” It is said that even a fool is considered intelligent when he maintains his silence, and that a guy who is able to keep his mouth shut is considered to be a man of intelligence. (Proverbs 17:27-28) Since the year 2005, Michael Bresciani has been serving as the publisher of American Prophet.org. It is because of the articles and reports written by Reverend Bresciani, as well as the contributions of some of the most talented writers and journalists in the United States, as well as the news and reviews that the website has acquired the moniker of “The Website for Insight.”
Author
jackemails@gmail.com